Cannot access basex instance with latest basex/dba image

On Wed, Feb 1, 2017 at 10:17 AM, Braunschweig, Björn <bjoern.braunschweig at gwdg.de> wrote: > Hey everybody, > > I have a basex/basexhttp:8.5.1 production container running. To access the > dba web interface I created a basex/dba container and connected it to the > same docker network. On the http://host:18984/dba/login was an input box to > connect to a remote BaseX server instance but with the latest basex/dba: > image (8.6.1 beta) this is gone… > > How am I now supposed to access the dba web ui ? > > Thanks in advance > Björn

-----Ursprüngliche Nachricht----- Von: Christian Grün [mailto:christian.gruen at gmail.com] Gesendet: Mittwoch, 1. Februar 2017 10:37 An: Braunschweig, Björn <bjoern.braunschweig at gwdg.de> Cc: basex-talk at mailman.uni-konstanz.de Betreff: Re: [basex-talk] Cannot access basex instance with latest basex/dba image Hi Björn, The old RESTXQ code led to increased numbers of system-wide read/write locks. This is why support for remote connections was removed. It’s good to know that people like you were using it, and we are definitely interested in reintroducing it in revised form in future. Until then, feel free to work with the DBA code of previous versions of BaseX, it is still functional. Cheers, Christian On Wed, Feb 1, 2017 at 10:17 AM, Braunschweig, Björn <bjoern.braunschweig at gwdg.de> wrote: > Hey everybody, > > I have a basex/basexhttp:8.5.1 production container running. To access > the dba web interface I created a basex/dba container and connected it > to the same docker network. On the http://host:18984/dba/login was an > input box to connect to a remote BaseX server instance but with the latest basex/dba: > image (8.6.1 beta) this is gone… > > How am I now supposed to access the dba web ui ? > > Thanks in advance > Björn

> a) Does this mean that since Version 8.6 there is no officially supported web interface for basex?

> b) What is the difference between the basex/basexhttp and basex/dba images? (I think the documentation at https://hub.docker.com/r/basex/basexhttp/ is now misleading)

> Hi Björn, > >> a) Does this mean that since Version 8.6 there is no officially supported web interface for basex? > > There still is. DBA is still part of BaseX, but it doesn’t provide > means to connect remotely. > >> b) What is the difference between the basex/basexhttp and basex/dba images? (I think the documentation at https://hub.docker.com/r/basex/basexhttp/ is now misleading) > > Personally, I can’t say anything about Docker. Maybe someone else on > the list knows more? > > Christian

> Am 01.02.2017 um 14:52 schrieb Maximilian Gärber <mgaerber at arcor.de>: > > Hi, > this is how it used to be: > > basex/basexhttp : the standard basex distribution for docker > basex/dba: only the DBA project > > The idea was to have both running independently where you would > connect from /dba to /basexhttp > > But this does not work anymore since 8.6 > > So for the time being, just use basex/dba prior to 8.6 > > > > > 2017-02-01 12:21 GMT+01:00 Christian Grün <christian.gruen at gmail.com>: >> Hi Björn, >> >>> a) Does this mean that since Version 8.6 there is no officially supported web interface for basex? >> >> There still is. DBA is still part of BaseX, but it doesn’t provide >> means to connect remotely. >> >>> b) What is the difference between the basex/basexhttp and basex/dba images? (I think the documentation at https://hub.docker.com/r/basex/basexhttp/ is now misleading) >> >> Personally, I can’t say anything about Docker. Maybe someone else on >> the list knows more? >> >> Christian