EXPath package format

On Mon, May 11, 2015 at 3:42 PM, Andy Bunce <bunce.andy at gmail.com> wrote: > Hi, > > It appears the EXPath package format has changed. The current version of the > spec reads: > > the root of the ZIP file contains a directory named content, containing the > components and any other file the package needs. > > http://expath.org/spec/pkg#descriptor > > A previous version http://expath.org/spec/pkg/20100107#d2e112 reads > > Alongside this descriptor, the root of the ZIP file contains a directory > named after the module name (see below) which contains the components and > any other file the package needs. > > BaseX appears only to support this earlier version. If a package using a > content folder is installed the following error is reported: > > [bxerr:BXRE0004] Package descriptor: Invalid attribute 'name' > > /Andy

On 12 May 2015 at 09:30, Christian Grün wrote: > Hi Andy, > > Thanks for the hint. I will browse through the current and the older > version of the spec in order to find out what else has changed. > > Christian > > > > On Mon, May 11, 2015 at 3:42 PM, Andy Bunce <bunce.andy at gmail.com> wrote: >> Hi, >> >> It appears the EXPath package format has changed. The current version of the >> spec reads: >> >> the root of the ZIP file contains a directory named content, containing the >> components and any other file the package needs. >> >> http://expath.org/spec/pkg#descriptor >> >> A previous version http://expath.org/spec/pkg/20100107#d2e112 reads >> >> Alongside this descriptor, the root of the ZIP file contains a directory >> named after the module name (see below) which contains the components and >> any other file the package needs. >> >> BaseX appears only to support this earlier version. If a package using a >> content folder is installed the following error is reported: >> >> [bxerr:BXRE0004] Package descriptor: Invalid attribute 'name' >> >> /Andy

On Tue, May 12, 2015 at 9:51 AM, Florent Georges <fgeorges at fgeorges.org> wrote: > Hi, > > That's correct Andy, that has changed some time ago, based on some feedback. > > For what it's worth, in the implementation for Saxon and Calabash, I > support both for a transitional period (if 'content' is there, that's > the new model, if a dir with the package name exists, then that's the > old format and I issue a warning but keep going, else it is a format > error). > > Regards, > > -- > Florent Georges > http://fgeorges.org/ > http://h2oconsulting.be/ > > > On 12 May 2015 at 09:30, Christian Grün wrote: >> Hi Andy, >> >> Thanks for the hint. I will browse through the current and the older >> version of the spec in order to find out what else has changed. >> >> Christian >> >> >> >> On Mon, May 11, 2015 at 3:42 PM, Andy Bunce <bunce.andy at gmail.com> wrote: >>> Hi, >>> >>> It appears the EXPath package format has changed. The current version of the >>> spec reads: >>> >>> the root of the ZIP file contains a directory named content, containing the >>> components and any other file the package needs. >>> >>> http://expath.org/spec/pkg#descriptor >>> >>> A previous version http://expath.org/spec/pkg/20100107#d2e112 reads >>> >>> Alongside this descriptor, the root of the ZIP file contains a directory >>> named after the module name (see below) which contains the components and >>> any other file the package needs. >>> >>> BaseX appears only to support this earlier version. If a package using a >>> content folder is installed the following error is reported: >>> >>> [bxerr:BXRE0004] Package descriptor: Invalid attribute 'name' >>> >>> /Andy

On 12 May 2015 at 09:52, Christian Grün wrote: > Hi Florent, > > Thanks for your comment. Do you plan to publish a diff version of the two specs? > > Christian > > > > On Tue, May 12, 2015 at 9:51 AM, Florent Georges <fgeorges at fgeorges.org> wrote: >> Hi, >> >> That's correct Andy, that has changed some time ago, based on some feedback. >> >> For what it's worth, in the implementation for Saxon and Calabash, I >> support both for a transitional period (if 'content' is there, that's >> the new model, if a dir with the package name exists, then that's the >> old format and I issue a warning but keep going, else it is a format >> error). >> >> Regards, >> >> -- >> Florent Georges >> http://fgeorges.org/ >> http://h2oconsulting.be/ >> >> >> On 12 May 2015 at 09:30, Christian Grün wrote: >>> Hi Andy, >>> >>> Thanks for the hint. I will browse through the current and the older >>> version of the spec in order to find out what else has changed. >>> >>> Christian >>> >>> >>> >>> On Mon, May 11, 2015 at 3:42 PM, Andy Bunce <bunce.andy at gmail.com> wrote: >>>> Hi, >>>> >>>> It appears the EXPath package format has changed. The current version of the >>>> spec reads: >>>> >>>> the root of the ZIP file contains a directory named content, containing the >>>> components and any other file the package needs. >>>> >>>> http://expath.org/spec/pkg#descriptor >>>> >>>> A previous version http://expath.org/spec/pkg/20100107#d2e112 reads >>>> >>>> Alongside this descriptor, the root of the ZIP file contains a directory >>>> named after the module name (see below) which contains the components and >>>> any other file the package needs. >>>> >>>> BaseX appears only to support this earlier version. If a package using a >>>> content folder is installed the following error is reported: >>>> >>>> [bxerr:BXRE0004] Package descriptor: Invalid attribute 'name' >>>> >>>> /Andy

> Not between 2 versions not next to each other (20120509 and > 20100107). But it happens that the change occurred between the latest > (20120509) and the directly previous one (20101111).

> So you can > follow the link "Revision markup", which is the diff version from an > edition against the previous one: > http://expath.org/spec/pkg/20120509/diff. > > Basically, in addition to the change with the content dir Andy > reported, there are the following changes in that edition: > > - new DTD and resource components > - dependency to a specific processor uses a URI > - new section on URI resolution > > Regards, > > -- > Florent Georges > http://fgeorges.org/ > http://h2oconsulting.be/ > > > On 12 May 2015 at 09:52, Christian Grün wrote: >> Hi Florent, >> >> Thanks for your comment. Do you plan to publish a diff version of the two specs? >> >> Christian >> >> >> >> On Tue, May 12, 2015 at 9:51 AM, Florent Georges <fgeorges at fgeorges.org> wrote: >>> Hi, >>> >>> That's correct Andy, that has changed some time ago, based on some feedback. >>> >>> For what it's worth, in the implementation for Saxon and Calabash, I >>> support both for a transitional period (if 'content' is there, that's >>> the new model, if a dir with the package name exists, then that's the >>> old format and I issue a warning but keep going, else it is a format >>> error). >>> >>> Regards, >>> >>> -- >>> Florent Georges >>> http://fgeorges.org/ >>> http://h2oconsulting.be/ >>> >>> >>> On 12 May 2015 at 09:30, Christian Grün wrote: >>>> Hi Andy, >>>> >>>> Thanks for the hint. I will browse through the current and the older >>>> version of the spec in order to find out what else has changed. >>>> >>>> Christian >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> On Mon, May 11, 2015 at 3:42 PM, Andy Bunce <bunce.andy at gmail.com> wrote: >>>>> Hi, >>>>> >>>>> It appears the EXPath package format has changed. The current version of the >>>>> spec reads: >>>>> >>>>> the root of the ZIP file contains a directory named content, containing the >>>>> components and any other file the package needs. >>>>> >>>>> http://expath.org/spec/pkg#descriptor >>>>> >>>>> A previous version http://expath.org/spec/pkg/20100107#d2e112 reads >>>>> >>>>> Alongside this descriptor, the root of the ZIP file contains a directory >>>>> named after the module name (see below) which contains the components and >>>>> any other file the package needs. >>>>> >>>>> BaseX appears only to support this earlier version. If a package using a >>>>> content folder is installed the following error is reported: >>>>> >>>>> [bxerr:BXRE0004] Package descriptor: Invalid attribute 'name' >>>>> >>>>> /Andy

On 12 May 2015 at 10:46, Christian Grün wrote: >> Not between 2 versions not next to each other (20120509 and >> 20100107). But it happens that the change occurred between the latest >> (20120509) and the directly previous one (20101111). > > Fine! > > I have updated the snapshot [1]; both 'content' and the abbrev > directory will now be detected. > Christian > > [1] http://files.basex.org/releases/latest/ > > >> So you can >> follow the link "Revision markup", which is the diff version from an >> edition against the previous one: >> http://expath.org/spec/pkg/20120509/diff. >> >> Basically, in addition to the change with the content dir Andy >> reported, there are the following changes in that edition: >> >> - new DTD and resource components >> - dependency to a specific processor uses a URI >> - new section on URI resolution >> >> Regards, >> >> -- >> Florent Georges >> http://fgeorges.org/ >> http://h2oconsulting.be/ >> >> >> On 12 May 2015 at 09:52, Christian Grün wrote: >>> Hi Florent, >>> >>> Thanks for your comment. Do you plan to publish a diff version of the two specs? >>> >>> Christian >>> >>> >>> >>> On Tue, May 12, 2015 at 9:51 AM, Florent Georges <fgeorges at fgeorges.org> wrote: >>>> Hi, >>>> >>>> That's correct Andy, that has changed some time ago, based on some feedback. >>>> >>>> For what it's worth, in the implementation for Saxon and Calabash, I >>>> support both for a transitional period (if 'content' is there, that's >>>> the new model, if a dir with the package name exists, then that's the >>>> old format and I issue a warning but keep going, else it is a format >>>> error). >>>> >>>> Regards, >>>> >>>> -- >>>> Florent Georges >>>> http://fgeorges.org/ >>>> http://h2oconsulting.be/ >>>> >>>> >>>> On 12 May 2015 at 09:30, Christian Grün wrote: >>>>> Hi Andy, >>>>> >>>>> Thanks for the hint. I will browse through the current and the older >>>>> version of the spec in order to find out what else has changed. >>>>> >>>>> Christian >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> On Mon, May 11, 2015 at 3:42 PM, Andy Bunce <bunce.andy at gmail.com> wrote: >>>>>> Hi, >>>>>> >>>>>> It appears the EXPath package format has changed. The current version of the >>>>>> spec reads: >>>>>> >>>>>> the root of the ZIP file contains a directory named content, containing the >>>>>> components and any other file the package needs. >>>>>> >>>>>> http://expath.org/spec/pkg#descriptor >>>>>> >>>>>> A previous version http://expath.org/spec/pkg/20100107#d2e112 reads >>>>>> >>>>>> Alongside this descriptor, the root of the ZIP file contains a directory >>>>>> named after the module name (see below) which contains the components and >>>>>> any other file the package needs. >>>>>> >>>>>> BaseX appears only to support this earlier version. If a package using a >>>>>> content folder is installed the following error is reported: >>>>>> >>>>>> [bxerr:BXRE0004] Package descriptor: Invalid attribute 'name' >>>>>> >>>>>> /Andy

On Tue, May 12, 2015 at 11:04 AM, Florent Georges <fgeorges at fgeorges.org> wrote: > 38 minutes between the email with the links, and a new build being > publicly released on the website. BaseX and Saxon are the 2 most > incredibly reactive companies to solve stuff! (and BaseX always makes > them available on a public snapshot!) > > -- > Florent Georges > http://fgeorges.org/ > http://h2oconsulting.be/ > > > On 12 May 2015 at 10:46, Christian Grün wrote: >>> Not between 2 versions not next to each other (20120509 and >>> 20100107). But it happens that the change occurred between the latest >>> (20120509) and the directly previous one (20101111). >> >> Fine! >> >> I have updated the snapshot [1]; both 'content' and the abbrev >> directory will now be detected. >> Christian >> >> [1] http://files.basex.org/releases/latest/ >> >> >>> So you can >>> follow the link "Revision markup", which is the diff version from an >>> edition against the previous one: >>> http://expath.org/spec/pkg/20120509/diff. >>> >>> Basically, in addition to the change with the content dir Andy >>> reported, there are the following changes in that edition: >>> >>> - new DTD and resource components >>> - dependency to a specific processor uses a URI >>> - new section on URI resolution >>> >>> Regards, >>> >>> -- >>> Florent Georges >>> http://fgeorges.org/ >>> http://h2oconsulting.be/ >>> >>> >>> On 12 May 2015 at 09:52, Christian Grün wrote: >>>> Hi Florent, >>>> >>>> Thanks for your comment. Do you plan to publish a diff version of the two specs? >>>> >>>> Christian >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> On Tue, May 12, 2015 at 9:51 AM, Florent Georges <fgeorges at fgeorges.org> wrote: >>>>> Hi, >>>>> >>>>> That's correct Andy, that has changed some time ago, based on some feedback. >>>>> >>>>> For what it's worth, in the implementation for Saxon and Calabash, I >>>>> support both for a transitional period (if 'content' is there, that's >>>>> the new model, if a dir with the package name exists, then that's the >>>>> old format and I issue a warning but keep going, else it is a format >>>>> error). >>>>> >>>>> Regards, >>>>> >>>>> -- >>>>> Florent Georges >>>>> http://fgeorges.org/ >>>>> http://h2oconsulting.be/ >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> On 12 May 2015 at 09:30, Christian Grün wrote: >>>>>> Hi Andy, >>>>>> >>>>>> Thanks for the hint. I will browse through the current and the older >>>>>> version of the spec in order to find out what else has changed. >>>>>> >>>>>> Christian >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> On Mon, May 11, 2015 at 3:42 PM, Andy Bunce <bunce.andy at gmail.com> wrote: >>>>>>> Hi, >>>>>>> >>>>>>> It appears the EXPath package format has changed. The current version of the >>>>>>> spec reads: >>>>>>> >>>>>>> the root of the ZIP file contains a directory named content, containing the >>>>>>> components and any other file the package needs. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> http://expath.org/spec/pkg#descriptor >>>>>>> >>>>>>> A previous version http://expath.org/spec/pkg/20100107#d2e112 reads >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Alongside this descriptor, the root of the ZIP file contains a directory >>>>>>> named after the module name (see below) which contains the components and >>>>>>> any other file the package needs. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> BaseX appears only to support this earlier version. If a package using a >>>>>>> content folder is installed the following error is reported: >>>>>>> >>>>>>> [bxerr:BXRE0004] Package descriptor: Invalid attribute 'name' >>>>>>> >>>>>>> /Andy