Replication, partition and the CAP theorem
Monday, 15 June 2015 · 2 messages
Z
ziiro_9415 Jun 2015 17:51 #
Hello,
I consider BaseX in the context of BigData and try to compare it with other noSQL databases. Yet, there is no replication or partition mechanism implemented and BaseX is a database with a single point of failure. Am I right? Thus, my question is, how can I classify the System BaseX regarding the CAP-Theorem?
Yours sincerely
---
Alle Postfächer an einem Ort. Jetzt wechseln und E-Mail-Adresse mitnehmen! Rundum glücklich mit freenetMail
CG
Christian Grün15 Jun 2015 21:43 #
Quoted text · ziiro_94 · 4 lines
> I consider BaseX in the context of BigData and try to compare it with other > noSQL databases. Yet, there is no replication or partition mechanism > implemented and BaseX is a database with a single point of failure. Am I > right?
Yes, you are right. For some more information on what has been done so far, feel free to check out some of our publications (e.g. [1,2]).
Quoted text · ziiro_94 · 2 lines
> Thus, my question is, how can I classify the System BaseX regarding > the CAP-Theorem?
Well, what classification do you currently think it is? What do you think is exactly the challenge in answering this question? ;)
Cheers,
Christian
[1] http://files.basex.org/publications/Kirsten%20[2014],%20Efficient%20and%20failure-aware%20replication%20of%20an%20XML%20database.pdf [2] http://files.basex.org/publications/Lewandowski%20[2012],%20Using%20Map%20and%20Reduce%20for%20Querying%20Distributed%20XML%20Data.pdf
Written for BaseX 8.2. BaseX may have changed since: please check the current documentation.
⚡Generated with XQuery